The
'problem of meaning' is something we hear a lot about; people are always searching
for ‘meaning’ for their lives, or else they are despairing that life has no
meaning, or else – and worst of all – a certain number of people argue that
unless you believe in what they
believe in, there can be no 'true' meaning for
you.
I
have come to think that the 'problem of meaning' stems from the fact that we
are ‘growing up’ as a species and coming to terms with the fact of our
existence in ways that our ancestors never had to face. We live in a
world that is as extensive as the earth itself; we do not live in the kinds of small,
isolated, communities that managed their own meaning-generation – via
mythological and religious systems of belief and thought – as our ancestors
did, more or less unchallenged by an ‘outside’ world. We are instantly
connected with people on other continents by way of the internet and television
broadcasts, newspapers and phone calls. We are thus more vividly
aware of the incredible diversity of cultures, beliefs and life-ways than our
ancestors, even a century ago, ever were. This has often been cited as a
source of the 'loss of meaning,' for how can what I believe to be meaningful
have validity, when there are people who believe something different?
The
problem of meaning is embedded in the problem of diversity.
The
'problem of meaning,' as I see it, seems to stem from the fact that
there are multiple ways of making life meaningful, and there is no 'absolute'
standard for what is to be considered 'genuine’ meaning. What we
have to understand, however – what we must grasp if we are going to get over
this 'problem' – is that we are
the meaning generating animal, and that this provides the key to a
meaningful life for us as individuals, as well as the rune for any kind of
genuine meaningfulness for communities.
It
used to be thought (and still is, unfortunately, by many supernaturalists, religionists
and others who appeal to some kind of “authority”) that 'meaning' is something
that can only be 'given' to us by someone or something bigger, higher, greater,
more powerful, etc., than we are. By this I mean that, for many people
across the ages, life was made meaningful for them because they believed a god
or else a human tyrant told them what life meant. They 'received' their
meaning 'from above,' whether that meaning was religious or ideological.
The
solution to the 'problem of meaning' is to be found, I would like to propose,
in an evolutionary perspective on life and depends on ourselves as a
manifestation of the ages-long process of evolution on this planet. We
have evolved as a sentient species that has consciousness, a key aspect of
which is the capacity for symbolic and metaphorical interpretation of life and
all that we find in the world.
Human
history is suffused with symbolic systems of meaning; whether these were
religious in nature, or else political, philosophical or simply personal and
thus idiosyncratic. Human beings interpret
their worlds; their contexts—their ‘environment’ isn't just taken 'as found,'
but is given a depth of resonance by the way in which we symbol things, use ‘things’
as metaphors, and tell stories about ourselves and the cosmos in which we
'find' ourselves.
What
I would like to urge, here, is that we
are still symbolic animals; we are interpreters, and that – once we see
that this is the result of our particular evolutionary history – the revelations
of science regarding the world we find ourselves in and our own species can
become the fresh foundation for new interpretations of life such as will can
make our existence and our situation in the world meaningful once again.
But
we must first embrace an evolutionary understanding of ourselves, and accept
that we are the meaning-generating animals. We have emerged as sentient,
conscious animals from a universe that has no implicit meaning in itself.
However, evolution has invested us with a symbolic, metaphorical mind, as well
as a rational mind, and by way of a symbolic, metaphorical kind of thinking and
feeling we can make meaning for ourselves in the world as science has revealed
it to us.
The
truth that we are meaning-generating animals and that this is our evolutionary
inheritance is something that needs to be embraced spiritually. The
realization that we make our own meaning is not 'the end of religion' or 'the
end of faith;' it is simply the end of a childish understanding of ourselves
that insists that only some transcendent authority figure can give us
meaning. If there is something corresponding to the word 'God,' and
that being has something to do with the way we are (perhaps it could be
seen as "the artist of the evolutionary history of the cosmos")
then the fact that we are the meaning-generating animal would have theological
consequences, as well as spiritual implications for those who are religious.
Yet
one does not have to be religious in
any way – or even have supernatural beliefs – in order to accept that we are
meaning generating animals! A thoroughly naturalistic worldview is sufficient
to ground our understanding of ourselves as meaning-generators. And this
may well be deeply liberating, as it means that every single human being on the
planet – every single person who has ever lived or who will ever live – has the
capacity to interpret their world, their environment, and their life-path in
ways that are symbolic and metaphorical, as well as historical and empirical,
and therefore generate meaning for themselves.
Communities
of people also have this ability, and groups of people devoted to the love of
life, in one way or another, have the freedom – simply as the kind of animal we
are – to find a sense of meaningfulness for themselves as well.
So
we no longer need to look to authority figures; or even to look outside
ourselves – for the source of meaning, for the origin of meaning lies within
us. Meaning arises from an interaction
between us and our environments filtered through our experiences.
No comments:
Post a Comment